Episode #9: Interprofessional Collaboration: The Upside of Hierarchy
Interprofessional Collaboration: The Upside of Hierarchy
Introduction to Episode:
Relationships are a critical element of interprofessional collaboration.
In today’s episode, we discuss hierarchy and partnership within the context of interprofessional collaboration in the healthcare setting.
There is a long history in the evolution of the health professions and how they work together that is rooted in social class and gender differences.
There is extensive literature describing the status inequities and power imbalances between physicians, nurses and other health professionals that exist today.
Historically these differences resulted in a hierarchical power structure within healthcare with the physician in the most superior position of the structure. Interprofessional collaboration and team processes challenge this hierarchical power structure.
Health professionals bump up against the tension between hierarchy and partnership every day as they try to work in collaborative ways.
When we experience hierarchical relationships as negative or as a problem, it’s natural to want to move away from the experience and toward the opposite, a more partnering relationship.
There is an upside to hierarchical relationships that we are at risk of losing if we over emphasize partnerships.
We need both hierarchical and partnering relationships to establish a healthy interprofessional collaborative culture.
Episode Summary Points:
· Long history of cultural, class and gender issues underlying current interprofessional collaboration
challenges
· Power authority within hierarchical structure of healthcare is challenged by interprofessional team
processes
· Lack of clarity on professional boundaries
· The term hierarchy brings up negative feelings/emotions
· Discuss this relationship using neutral terms vertical (hierarchy) and horizontal (partnership)
relationships
· Cardiac arrest as an example of leveraging hierarchy and partnership (vertical/horizontal) polarity
· When in the downside of hierarchical (vertical) relationship it is often seen as a problem to solve
· Positive outcomes of vertical (hierarchy) relationship
· What’s at risk if you over emphasize horizontal (partnership) relationships
· Action steps to achieve positive outcomes of both vertical and horizontal relationships
· Focusing on the shared purpose can help relieve tension and open people up to positive attributes of
each pole
Teaching Points:
· Both types of relationships are necessary to establish an interprofessional collaborative culture
· Engage in dialogue to uncover the “rightness” of each type of relationship
· Recognize your preference pole and blind spots
· If you are in a position of power be aware of how your preference can influence how well or poorly
this polarity is leveraged
· Use Polarity Thinking™ framework and language to explore current realities and establish complete
picture of reality
References:
Alexarian, J.A., Kitto, S., Rak, K.J., & Reeves, S. (2015). Beyond the team: Understanding interprofessional work in two North American ICUs. Critical Care Medicine, 43(9): 1880-1886
Goldman, S., Reeves, S., Wu, R., Silver, I., MacMillan, K., & Kitto, S. (2016). A sociological exploration of the tensions related to interprofessional collaboration in acute-care discharge planning. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(2): 217-225. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1072803
Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, Suppl 1: 188-196.
Hewitt, G., Sims, S., & Harris, R. (2014). Using realist synthesis to understand the mechanisms of interprofessional teamwork in health and social care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(6): 501-506. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.939744
Lingard, L., McDougall, A., Levstik, M., Chandok, N., Spafford, M. M., & Schryer, C. (2012). Representing complexity well: A story about teamwork, with implications for how we teach collaboration. Medical Education 46: 869–877 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04339.x
Orchard, C. A., Curran, V., & Kabene, S. (2005). Creating a culture for interdisciplinary collaborative professional practice. Medical Education Online, 10(1): 4387. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v10i.4387.
Wesorick, B. (2016). Polarity Thinking in Healthcare: The Missing Logic to Achieve Transformation. Amherst, MA, HRD Press, Inc.
Follow us on Social Media!
Subscribe & Review in iTunes/Apple Podcasts
If you found value in this episode, please leave us a review on iTunes! Our mission is to start “a movement” of leaders who address the chronic challenges in healthcare through a Polarity Thinking™ lens! We want to share the wisdom in the podcast with healthcare leaders everywhere! Just click here to review, select “Ratings and Reviews” and “Write a Review” and tell us what your favorite part of the podcast is.”